BHQS9 and BHQS10

One of my all time favorites that I've never heard in good quality: Baroque Monthly - You Are Your Only Mistery.
That would be great!
AZ54
 
Mark...I find it real fascinating how you and Ned talk about sound reproduction. I must admit half the time I ain't got a clue what you're talking about. I leave the technical stuff to the experts and pro's like you two.

If you've got these folk janglers in your archive please consider them for BHQS9.2

The Changing Times - Cry
The Chessmen - Sad
The Shadows Of Knight - Three For Love
 
Out of the top of my head:

Reasons why - don't be that way

Danny and the counts - you need love

The Dogs - don't try to help me
 
Hotbeats is cool choice!

These deserve your consideration IMO:

Kriss Kross And The Other Angles - Honeymoon Tree
Missing Links - Come Inside My Heart
 
Sherwoods - I Know You Cried
Viscounts - Empty Heart
Shades Of Depression - I'm A Fool
Outspoken Blues - Misty, You're A Better Man Than I
Shades - Open Your Eyes

Ned
 
Frantic said:
If this process could improve the LORDS on Vance even 1%, I'd be eternally grateful:cool:
Click to expand...

Oh man - that's a challenge...that pressing is the sonic pits. On top of that, my copy has every known defect probably including cracks, warps, some kind of chemical spill, rampant groove distortion and shocking surface noise! But I'll give it a try.
 
I tried the Lords on Vance tonight. I did not do a thorough job with the click/noise removal. All I did was paint out some of the worst clicks. Even that took way too much time...I'm not sure if the end result is even one percent better than the original transfer I supplied for you, Joey.
The problem is, the disc is buffed and whatever subtleties of resolution which may have been present in the original pressing, have been polished away.
I must have spent a lot of time on the original transfer, because it has way more noise removed than what I did tonight. I'm leaving the rest up to you Joey, if you think the basic 9.2 sound has any potential. I think it's a little better overall, but not much.


The record is not warped or cracked, after all.
 
bosshoss said:
I tried the Lords on Vance tonight. I did not do a thorough job with the click/noise removal. All I did was paint out some of the worst clicks. Even that took way too much time...I'm not sure if the end result is even one percent better than the original transfer I supplied for you, Joey.
The problem is, the disc is buffed and whatever subtleties of resolution which may have been present in the original pressing, have been polished away.
I must have spent a lot of time on the original transfer, because it has way more noise removed than what I did tonight. I'm leaving the rest up to you Joey, if you think the basic 9.2 sound has any potential. I think it's a little better overall, but not much.

The record is not warped or cracked, after all.
Click to expand...

Mark -

The surface noise is easily overlooked by the chaotic assault that lies underneath it. Is there a date on this record, sounds a little earlier than 1966 ? Somehow, your rig extracted great dynamics despite all the obvious flaws. Is there only one copy of this mess ?

Ned
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mr.Segment
Century Records garage/rock/psych discography
Replies
10
Views
15K
MopTopMike
MopTopMike