definition of Garage

michaelvee

Ikon Class
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Location
Italy, Bologna
recently, for my 60s 45s Archive I had to summon up the term Garage. Here's my attempt. Additions, critics and comments, good or bad, are most welcome:

"The term “Garage" was chosen by aficionados and collectors in order to classify recordings mostly done „on a shoestring“, in cheap studios without any „production“, or in a garage.

Garage music is the story of four friends who did not know to play their guitars and drums but met in a garage and started to play “Wild Thing” and “Gloria”. Soon they would tour the nation and, eventually, land a recording contract or self-finance a recording.
Of those recordings, 100 – 500 were pressed and mostly were given away at concerts or sent to promoters and radio stations.
More than a few of those were finally picked up by major labels that would promote the group for several years issuing 7inchs and LPs (these recordings are NOT in the archive).
But most of the self-financed and one shot records got “shelved" and sank without any success, most got lost, many were dumped and a few were even used as shooting targets by unsatisfied artists. Sometimes only 1 sole copy survived (the archive’s scope is precisely to save those recordings from oblivion!)

Garage bands mostly copied both American RnR material and the UK-Beat book, but also excelled in self penned originals.

In a wider sense, the term “Garage” (at least in this archive’s collection) includes groups who were superstars in their far away homelands (India, Philippines, Peru…) but unknown anywhere else.

Furthermore, the same term includes rare recordings by famous artists done in a “Garage” style.

The typical audio quality of a Garage record is extremely low fi, includes hiss, pops and scratches resulting in a “poor”, stripped to the bone sound where some instruments got nearly completely soaked up in the mix and need a close listen (and imagination!) to be heard.
(on the other hand, this bad audio experience is not different to the listening in the 60s when 7inchers were played 100 times on the same cheap player or via audio cassette, go figure!)

The criteria of the archive’s collection are both objective (rarity) and subjective (“nice version / song”); if both these criteria are fulfilled, the tune makes it in, even if the audio quality is poor.
 
please take into account that this description is for people who have no clue about Garage at all
So why mislead them by perpetuating this old, discredited myth? I would say that the majority of USA garage 45s were recorded with good equipment, by people who knew what they were doing, even in the small studios. Bear in mind that the places that were recording the teen bands were also recording other musical acts, so a place that offered poor quality was not likely to last for long. It would be more credible, and I would argue, more interesting for these readers to hear that there was a thriving independent scene with a lot of professional operators, right across the USA. It's incredible that a teen band had access in their local area to a good recording studio and record pressing, and probably also a local radio station that wasn't part of a multinational, being told what to play by head office.
 
So why mislead them by perpetuating this old, discredited myth? I would say that the majority of USA garage 45s were recorded with good equipment, by people who knew what they were doing, even in the small studios. Bear in mind that the places that were recording the teen bands were also recording other musical acts, so a place that offered poor quality was not likely to last for long. It would be more credible, and I would argue, more interesting for these readers to hear that there was a thriving independent scene with a lot of professional operators, right across the USA. It's incredible that a teen band had access in their local area to a good recording studio and record pressing, and probably also a local radio station that wasn't part of a multinational, being told what to play by head office.

I perfectly agree with you Michael tho this might go only for some of the groups whereas many had to deliver their recordings in just a few hours. Anyway, I will add your thoughts to my essay. thx.
 
There's too many generalizations, such as not knowing how to play their instruments, or touring the nation. The overwhelming majority of groups played within a radius of their hometown, and many were established bands that changed direction as a result of the Beatles.

You also indicate a "garage style" but don't clearly define what that is.
 
I agr
There's too many generalizations, such as not knowing how to play their instruments, or touring the nation. The overwhelming majority of groups played within a radius of their hometown, and many were established bands that changed direction as a result of the Beatles.

You also indicate a "garage style" but don't clearly define what that is.

I agree there's some generalizations but I wanted to create a clearer idea for people not used to the subject that's why I exaggerated a bit. At any rate, the reader should understand we're not talking about Chicago Transit Authority here.
 
recently, for my 60s 45s Archive I had to summon up the term Garage. Here's my attempt. Additions, critics and comments, good or bad, are most welcome:

"The term “Garage" was chosen by aficionados and collectors in order to classify recordings mostly done „on a shoestring“, in cheap studios without any „production“, or in a garage.

Garage music is the story of four friends who did not know to play their guitars and drums but met in a garage and started to play “Wild Thing” and “Gloria”. Soon they would tour the nation and, eventually, land a recording contract or self-finance a recording.
Of those recordings, 100 – 500 were pressed and mostly were given away at concerts or sent to promoters and radio stations.
More than a few of those were finally picked up by major labels that would promote the group for several years issuing 7inchs and LPs (these recordings are NOT in the archive).
But most of the self-financed and one shot records got “shelved" and sank without any success, most got lost, many were dumped and a few were even used as shooting targets by unsatisfied artists. Sometimes only 1 sole copy survived (the archive’s scope is precisely to save those recordings from oblivion!)

Garage bands mostly copied both American RnR material and the UK-Beat book, but also excelled in self penned originals.

In a wider sense, the term “Garage” (at least in this archive’s collection) includes groups who were superstars in their far away homelands (India, Philippines, Peru…) but unknown anywhere else.

Furthermore, the same term includes rare recordings by famous artists done in a “Garage” style.

The typical audio quality of a Garage record is extremely low fi, includes hiss, pops and scratches resulting in a “poor”, stripped to the bone sound where some instruments got nearly completely soaked up in the mix and need a close listen (and imagination!) to be heard.
(on the other hand, this bad audio experience is not different to the listening in the 60s when 7inchers were played 100 times on the same cheap player or via audio cassette, go figure!)

The criteria of the archive’s collection are both objective (rarity) and subjective (“nice version / song”); if both these criteria are fulfilled, the tune makes it in, even if the audio quality is poor.
I pretty much don't agree with anything you've said. ;)
 
to better define the Garage-style , I've tried this:

"
Musically, the Garage music genre may probably best defined by excluding: songs longer than 3’, other instruments than guitar, bass and drums (plus, occasionally, keyboards, brass, and orchestra!), guitar- or whatever solos longer than 2 refrains (Grateful Dead), neither too progressive (Zappa) nor lame or kitschy (Moody Blues), nor alike the “classical” chart-busters, no influences of Jazz, Folk or Folklore (Garage musicians look forwards!).
Thematically, groups go a bit beyound the borders of Dance&Romance by introducing sexual and social (later political) issues.

If you found a 7inch records from the 60s, maybe with a strange sounding artiste name on it, recorded just by guitars, bass and drums, than 90% you hold a valid Garage record in your hand. Nothing less than a young generation’s attempt to build a freer world. "

agree / not agree?

There's too many generalizations, such as not knowing how to play their instruments, or touring the nation. The overwhelming majority of groups played within a radius of their hometown, and many were established bands that changed direction as a result of the Beatles.

You also indicate a "garage style" but don't clearly define what that is.[/quot
 
to better define the Garage-style , I've tried this:

Musically, the Garage music genre may probably best defined by excluding: songs longer than 3’, other instruments than guitar, bass and drums (plus, occasionally, keyboards, brass, and orchestra!)

Just looking through some of the scans on my Facebook:
Lenny Drake - One woman man 3:20
Psychotrons - Death is a dream 3:23
Chancellors - One in a million 3:10
Calliope - Streets of boston 3:35
Dennis & the Times - Flight patterns 3:06
Smacks - Reckless ways 3:02
Alan Burn - Whirlpool 3:13
Shades of Night - Fluctuation 3:35

Whereas, it is true as a generalisation that garage songs were under 3 minutes, it's not a defining generalisation, because it applies equally to popular music of that time.

And by your second criterion above, you would have to exclude the THIRTEENTH FLOOR ELEVATORS - You're Gonna Miss Me - a song widely regarded as being the number one garage anthem. Once again, while generally true, it doesn't help to separate garage from pop and beat generally, and is therefore not useful.
 
As BHQS has clearly demonstrated, poor quality sound is far from a consistent characteristic of sixties garage. Much of the reputation of '60s garage having poor quality sound can be directly attributed to, initially, the bootleggers, as well as the legitimate reissuers of the original recordings, and more recently, to the youtubers and low-fi mp3 bloggers (not to mention any names) of the genre.

Having said that, it is clearly the case that low-fi recording is a significant part of the original '60s garage sound. This fact became clear to me as I began to notice that songs which I only knew from noisy low-fi tape recordings, somehow sounded more like pop when I acquired the original record. Although far from being a universal phenomenon, it occurred frequently enough to convince me that fidelity played a salient role in defining sixties garage. This again has already been discussed in the thread I've linked above.
 
Just looking through some of the scans on my Facebook:
Lenny Drake - One woman man 3:20
Psychotrons - Death is a dream 3:23
Chancellors - One in a million 3:10
Calliope - Streets of boston 3:35
Dennis & the Times - Flight patterns 3:06
Smacks - Reckless ways 3:02
Alan Burn - Whirlpool 3:13
Shades of Night - Fluctuation 3:35

Whereas, it is true as a generalisation that garage songs were under 3 minutes, it's not a defining generalisation, because it applies equally to popular music of that time.

And by your second criterion above, you would have to exclude the THIRTEENTH FLOOR ELEVATORS - You're Gonna Miss Me - a song widely regarded as being the number one garage anthem. Once again, while generally true, it doesn't help to separate garage from pop and beat generally, and is therefore not useful.
you're right., I should have stated "exeptions made".
 
I share everything you say. I was, in fact, I was referring to the lowfi sound of originals since this the first obstacle you have to face when yu talk to a person to introduce. I think to divide that from percect pop sounds is a characteristic. For the rest, some people out there are doin a fav job to enhance the sound experience, bravo! I will add your thought to my essay, permission given)

thx

personally, I take all from best CD and LP copies down to bad mp3s (take it or lave it; give me a better audio source)

As BHQS has clearly demonstrated, poor quality sound is far from a consistent characteristic of sixties garage. Much of the reputation of '60s garage having poor quality sound can be directly attributed to, initially, the bootleggers, as well as the legitimate reissuers of the original recordings, and more recently, to the youtubers and low-fi mp3 bloggers (not to mention any names) of the genre.

Having said that, it is clearly the case that low-fi recording is a significant part of the original '60s garage sound. This fact became clear to me as I began to notice that songs which I only knew from noisy low-fi tape recordings, somehow sounded more like pop when I acquired the original record. Although far from being a universal phenomenon, it occurred frequently enough to convince me that fidelity played a salient role in defining sixties garage. This again has already been discussed in the thread I've linked above.
e