- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
Seems like an obvious question that hasn't ever come up before. This is an anonymous poll - your name will not appear beside your vote. If you want to disclose your "vote", you can do that in a comment.
Total number is meaningless. It has to be an equation which factors in rating, condition, rarity, and relevance. Extra points should be awarded for complete sets; for example, if you have every Ikon label for which at least one side rates no less than 4, you can score an extra 30% above the total value of that set.
no one on earth has every Ikon 45? Not even the LORD himself!Total number is meaningless. It has to be an equation which factors in rating, condition, rarity, and relevance. Extra points should be awarded for complete sets; for example, if you have every Ikon label for which at least one side rates no less than 4, you can score an extra 30% above the total value of that set.
Thanks for just sucking all the fun out of this.![]()
I'd go further, and deduct 1 point for every sucky, or irrelevant 45 you have in your garage collection. Except that would leave some collectors with negative scores, so I'd cap it at 50%. After all, presentation is important. If a fellow garage enthusiast ever goes through your collection, you want him to be impressed by every single he sees, rather than it being a simulation of going through records at a flea market.
I should have said, no one on earth has every decent Ikon 45. Although there are actually a bunch of really awful Ikon 45s. Country, Easy listening, folk etc.Are you saying every Ikon 45 is worth owning? IE, at least one of the sides rates at least 4? Or that no one owns every decent 45 in the set?
I'd go further, and deduct 1 point for every sucky, or irrelevant 45 you have in your garage collection. Except that would leave some collectors with negative scores, so I'd cap it at 50%. After all, presentation is important. If a fellow garage enthusiast ever goes through your collection, you want him to be impressed by every single he sees, rather than it being a simulation of going through records at a flea market.
By that reasoning, you would only collect the TBM top 1000. Because all the others probably have been given low-ish scores by many other collectors. For a record to score an average 5, it must have got some scores of 3 and 4. The collectors who gave it 3 would be disgusted to see it in your collection. But who cares what other collectors think? They all have different taste to mine, and yours. For example, Lenny Drake "Love Eyes" gets a score of 2/10 from 2 cabinet members. I give it much more than that. I think you give it 9 or 10/10?