Rhythm Boy points out the inoperative cancer in the world of record collecting - the overpriced (and, in most cases, equally over-graded) offerings of 45s by a seller. Motives are either clueless, greed-driven, or a combination of both in varying degrees.
The recent d**k move by a "collector" on discogs, posting 45s he has but does not want to sell; hence, $6K and up ransom price tags. The fact that discogs does not let a user block a seller when perusing 45s makes this most annoying.....Of course, this inane yet laughable pricing causes a rippling effect for anyone who wants to sell one of those 45s and must price it near to these ridiculous offerings, for want of getting ripped off (exactly what another seller relayed to me). I've never understood people who post 45s for sale, the prices are too high, and yet the person remains married to his asking price. If you REALLY want to sell something that sits unsold at your original asking price, lower the price by more than a measly 10%, or better yet - or auction it. The excuse "I have X amount into it" = you over-paid if you cannot sell it for the price paid, let alone at a profit.
This is one reason I've backed down considerably from the 45 acquistions game over the past couple of years...that, and the comforting fact that I have a high percentage (85%) of the collectible U.S. garage 45s by now, prices paid by me for hi-grades even recently were far, far less than what newbies or the dj sect are fighting over & coughing up for beaters.
My interest now is picking up fairly priced remaining wants via private deals from respected sellers who don't flaunt wares on the net or social media, and 45s I have been seeking for many years but are thankfully off the radar of most collectors of the genre. Here is an example - this was a give-a-way priced, very scarce 45 recently snagged as the year closed. I'm sure the Ohio experts know more than thou, but I would think there cannot be too many of these floating around
View attachment 5607