Items like the Elois just never show up, except as bootlegs. Looking at the original copy of the Elois shown in the photo below, you can see that the dot above the "i" in the "in" logo is properly centered. Bootleg copies have a lop-sided dot.
Hmmm, entirely possible I'm seeing things not as they are, but as I perceive them to be. In other words, do these two copies look exactly the same, or does the darker colored label example (my copy of 15 or so years) appear to have the "I" off just a bit to the left than the lighter colored label (Marks') copy? The matrix on mine is hand etched IN S 8067 BY MY SIDE paired with what resembles a small etched JW l=1 directly opposite on the other side of the dead wax. Never having seen a repro / boot I've no idea of any other distinctive characteristics either might have? I'm quite certain mine is original, though I've no idea when the reissue / boot edition may have been issued.
One thing for certain, my copy certainly has a generous & varied array of undoubtedly vintage hairlines & surface distress. None of which, fortunately, impacts on the ferocious intensity of the playback.
My guess is that there may have been a bit of variation in the printing of the labels, and the copy used for the later re-issue simply utilized an original with the off center "I". But then again, how many copies would have been pressed of the original? BTW, there is what I recall as an alternate pic of the band from the one pictured below in an issue of Go- Set.
An issue that almost certainly currently resides in a facility roughly 878.2 km from Melbourne.
& in the interest of all in take no prisoners trainspottingly sad geekery heres the flip. Also just a bit off, perhaps? Sort of not unlike this post???
