- Joined
- Apr 12, 2011
- Location
- Sydney, Australia
Soundog - your copy is definitely an original. I have never seen that darker yellow label before. It seems that the position of the dot is not a reliable indicator after all, and there was some slight variation as you have guessed. There are however other ways to tell. The word "RECORDS" under the "in" logo is much further down, on the boot. Below is a picture of the boot taken from a current ebay auction. All copies of the boot look exactly like this.
On all the originals I have ever seen, including yours, the word "RECORDS" is much closer to the "in" logo. If you scan and superimpose the boot label on top of the original, you will see that all the black lettering has been enlarged on the boot, and extends closer to the edges all round. The red elements of the design are not enlarged.
I know for certain mine is an original because it came from the archives of the USA branch of W&G records, which was called Melbourne Records. There were 2 mint copies of The Elois together with many other mint copies of various in and W&G 45s. Somehow Bill Nadolny got hold of the archives, and sold them off about 15 years ago.

On all the originals I have ever seen, including yours, the word "RECORDS" is much closer to the "in" logo. If you scan and superimpose the boot label on top of the original, you will see that all the black lettering has been enlarged on the boot, and extends closer to the edges all round. The red elements of the design are not enlarged.
I know for certain mine is an original because it came from the archives of the USA branch of W&G records, which was called Melbourne Records. There were 2 mint copies of The Elois together with many other mint copies of various in and W&G 45s. Somehow Bill Nadolny got hold of the archives, and sold them off about 15 years ago.