The Beatles In Mono - vinyl box set

I'd agree with MTM on "D.W. Washburn." IMHO it's one of the worst records ever released by a superstar band. Along with several other bad choices made in that annus horriblus of 1968, it helped to destroy their run at the top.
 
I think that anybody who doesn't appreciate The Beatles music should go back and listen very carefully to those melodies and the chord progressions which created those songs. It's all of those great melodies that stand out. I have to admit The Beatles were not one of my favorite groups in the 60's. Weird when I think about it because I never bought a Beatles album back then. At the time I was much more into The Animals, The Kinks, The Rolling Stones and Steppenwolf. I was buying LP's by all of those groups but mostly I bought 45's. I did however buy some Beatles 45's which I really liked at the time. A polished studio group or not, those records sounded great coming through those transistor radios. And when you tear those songs apart and start listening to the different playing going on of John, Paul, George, & Ringo you can easily see that their musicianship was terrific--very talented players and singers. So, I probably came to the party late as far as The Beatles go, but I do now appreciate more than ever what they accomplished with all that great playing and singing and all of the inspiration they gave to others to go out and write their own songs. When you think of a Beatles song it's funny how you can immediately start singing it or get that melody into your head and there is a reason that happens.
 
Also of note that the vocals sounded as good as they did live when you KNOW that they did not have what we would today think of as good stage monitors (and had super loud amps on stage to contend with, not to mention a room full of screaming teens).
 
index.php


Funny, Lou is carrying a QANTAS bag.
 
I just looked up Quantas, had no idea what it is, and found they're based in Botany Bay. Isn't that right around the corner from where you live, Mark?
 
I just looked up Quantas, had no idea what it is, and found they're based in Botany Bay. Isn't that right around the corner from where you live, Mark?

Sydney airport in Mascot is close to our factory in East Botany. Qantas is Australia's national airline. I live in Rose Bay, half an hour's drive from the airport and factory.
 
I wanna say something about the Beatles, because today when listening to them I cried so hard that it almost tore me apart. First I listened to the Mono Masters triple LP. Strangely noone here really went into discussing the sound, which I thought is the main reason for the box set. Anyway, a friend said "Help" doesn't sound too great compared to the others. So I probably started with the wrong album. I'm still thinking about getting the box, but still not sure if I really need it. The Mono Masters LP sounds pretty great, I have to say. The Yellow Submarine tracks in mono are mindblowing.

But then I put my original mono copy of the White Album on the turntable and couldn't hold back the tears, also maybe because it was the second album I got as a kid, a birthday present from my grandparents who have died long since. It was exactly 35 years ago when I listened to it for the first time, it was winter, and I couldn't believe what I heard. The diversity of the songs. And the sheer greatness. And today it all came back, my whole life in those songs.

I know that most of you don't dig the late Beatles. But as Miracle Mirror says quite rightly, you have to go back and listen carefully. Of all Beatles albums I think the White Album is the most timeless. I'd go so far to say it's probably the most timeless pop music ever created. It doesn't sound like Sixties. It sounds like yesterday, today and tomorrow. And you look at those big pictures of them and they look so goddamn young! How on earth were they able to create that stuff at that age?!?! After all the other epochal, I mean literally epochal stuff they had already created! Year after fucking year! Those four pale dudes had access to some source of creativity that is absolutely miraculous.

I'd even like to go a step further and say something about Paul McCartney. That guy might be anything, but he surely is not a dofus. He is one half of Lennon/McCartney and there would be no Lennon without McCartney. And he is one quarter of the Beatles and there would be no Beatles without him either.
I had a time when I'd only listen to Lennon (and Harrison) songs. Because I dispised McCartney, mainly for his annoying comments on the Beatles. For him saying stuff and not having Lennon around to react to it. Plainly because Lennon shouldn't have died, which still can bring tears to my eyes at any given moment, because I really really love and admire that guy so much. Even now I can't hold it back. Just the fucking stupidity and tragedy of that incident.
Anyway, I even thought McCartney's songs are bland. Oh boy. How wrong can you be? Bland? Paul McCartney songs? Has anyone seen Brian Wilson's list of favourite songs in the Mojo Magazine some years ago? It was ALL Beatles songs, and mostly McCartney songs. I mean there's really nothing else to say about McCartney as a songwriter.

And then you sit down and put the White Album on the turntable, in goddamn mono. And it takes off with that airliner sound and here comes the best and funniest political statement the Beatles ever did, in the form of a perfect upgrading of early Beach Boys sound. Not Lennon, who was much more into giving political statements, no, it's fucking ingenious ole McCartney who hits the mark:

"Show me round your snow peaked mountains way down south
Take me to your daddy's farm
Let me hear your balalaika's ringing out
Come and keep your comrade warm.
I'm back in the U.S.S.R.
You don't know how lucky you are boys
Back in the U.S.S.R."

What else was there to say during the Cold War? Especially in a pop song. Than: these people may be Russians, they might even be Communists, but they are people. Like me, like you, not any different, eyes, ears, heart, brain, everything. And they have homes where they live and families and friends. Like any goddamn human has or should have. Kudos, Mr. McCartney!
I was in Kiev a few years ago and I'd never say anything against the Californian girls, but those Ukraine girls did knock me out. Beautiful I mean! Charming, too. But of course that's not the point. The point is it's just a great piece of humour and humanity.
Oh, and then the postman rang twice. I was still crying, so I hesitated. I decided to open the door, just in case he would bring a record. I had tears all over my face. He must have thought I'm either having serious problems or being on drugs or whatever. He was kind, even sympathetic. A man from Eastern Europe, probably Russian. I was very thankful for his reaction. The parcel wasn't even for me, but for the neighbours. Hahaha!

And then you have a song like "I Will", which may sound like just a little song, but actually it's McCartney at the peak of his skill. Today I realized it's in fact a Beat ballad, just like the early stuff he wrote, only more accomplished. Listen to the chords and melody: it's Beatles '64. You even got the typical bongo rolling along. It's so big, without being pompous. In fact it's shy. Shy and monumental at the same time. That is the goddamn fucking everlasting Beatles. There are still kids, I mean young kids, 12, 13 years old, getting into music through the Beatles. And I'm sure that will be the case for a long time to come.

I could go on forever, but I think I'll just leave it at that. Sorry if I took some of your precious time. White album in original mono- that is the message.

Have a good one,
cheers,
Axel
 
I've never been so taken by the White Album. The last Beatles LP that really got to me was Revolver. I was disappointed by everything that followed, even disgusted by some of it. But If I had to pick one post-Revolver LP that I kinda liked, it would be the White Album.
 
I've never been so taken by the White Album. The last Beatles LP that really got to me was Revolver. I was disappointed by everything that followed, even disgusted by some of it. But If I had to pick one post-Revolver LP that I kinda liked, it would be the White Album.
I have to agree 100%. I love Revolver and Rubber Soul...my faves. With a few exceptions, it's all downhill from there.
 
I think there's only one really bad song on the W. album, and that is in fact so bad, that it can almost ruin the whole thing. It's so embarrassing that I don't even want to write or say the title. It starts with an O and ends with an a. Please don't mention it. I would like to cut it out of the vinyl. To me it's by far the worst thing they did. Someone should have said: No, Paulie, we don't want shit on our records.
 
Sorry, me again, but here's a little piece of information for Beatles fans. Just recently I realized that the whole concept of the White Album cover, including photos and poster, was created by one of the most important British artists of the 20th century: Richard Hamilton. Last year in London I bought a catalogue of a huge exhibition of his work at Tate Modern. His stuff is not easily accessible. But if you get into it, it's quite amazing. He is mainly commenting or questioning or associating modernity, whatever. The White Album cover is typical for his work, especially the poster.
He is actually considered the founder of Pop Art, even before Pop Art started in the States. This is an early key work of the Pop Art movement, even using the word "pop", with the great title "Just what is it that makes today's homes so different so appealing?":

059a.jpg


And for you rock'n'rollers out there, who think why the fuck is this idiot babbling about modern art. How about this piece here, with a record of Gene Vincent thrown in for good measure:

living-arts.jpg
 
Weird, I'd always thought it was purely Yoko behind the art gallery concept behind the White Album(s)... what with her half a room installation that was all white and other things. I'd never have suspected Richard Hamilton having any influence on it never mind masterminding it, does it credit him somewhere I haven't looked axel? The framework concept is what makes the White Album for me whereas Sgt. Pepper is like a grab bag of disparate tracks thrown into a kid's album sleeve. I love some of the more experimental items from Magical Mystery and Yellow Submarine, It's All Too Much and Flying were cutting edge and extremely influential. The Magical Mystery concept too was more kiddie album trappings, and ultimately I think all of that sort of downgraded the Beatles in many peoples' eyes. I wonder why they did that while still making some genuinely challenging music for adults? Maybe just a lack of any other direction? Revolver was their peak for me too, there's even a whole book just about that which is worth finding.
 
Bland? Paul McCartney songs? Has anyone seen Brian Wilson's list of favourite songs in the Mojo Magazine some years ago? It was ALL Beatles songs, and mostly McCartney songs. I mean there's really nothing else to say about McCartney as a songwriter.

See 'Going Underground: Paul McCartney, The Beatles And The UK Counter-Culture' DVD released in 2013
 
There's probably no use in discussing Sgt.Pepper's here, because so many people here seem to hate it so much. I do agree that it's not the best Beatles album though. But I do like the cover a lot. It's nice to have Dion DiMucci on it, too. But mainly because I'm a big fan of Peter Blake's work and British Pop Art in general.
Here's some decent stuff of his:

P04038_10.jpg


arts-graphics-2007_1180050a.jpg


bo-diddley.jpg
 
That's alright, it's just something I never thought a lot about because I assumed it was a Yoko thing, like Revolver was a Klaus thing. :oops:

I like that Stu Sutcliffe, Shirley Temple, and Dion (great voice) were in the Lonely Hearts crowd.
 
Not exactly courtesy of the Sarge but the Gun. One reason why Smile was dumped was that the Brits were quicker with their release of Pepper's. Which also might be one reason why it is so patchy. Especially side 2 is pretty much huddled together.
But remove, say "When I'm 64", and replace it with "Strawberry Fields"/ "Penny Lane", which obviously didn't really work as a 45 anyway, and "Not Guilty" (only one of George's songs? And that's Indian? No way!), and you might get an album almost as good as Revolver.
How bout this scenario:

A side
Taxman - Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band
Eleanor Rigby - She's Leaving Home (not quite as good, but still one of McCartney's best)
I'm Only Sleeping - Strawberry Fields Forever
Love You To - Within You, Without You
Here, There & Everywhere - Fixing A Hole
Yellow Submarine - With A Little Help From My Friends
She Said She Said - Lucy In The Sky With Diamonds (of course ole Lennon isn't on the Byrds anymore but on some other substance which he actually got from the Byrds and took it like 24 hours, 7 days a week; other people went nuts with amounts like that)

B side
Good Day Sunshine - Penny Lane
And Your Bird Can Sing - Benefit of Mr.Kite (same thing as Lucy, but Benefit is totally ingenious shit)
For No One - empty (write another one like that! "When I'm 64" is not enough. Fix THAT hole instead of spending so much time for that silly costuming concept!)
Dr. Robert - Good Morning
I Want To Tell You - Not Guilty
Got To Get You Into My Life - Lovely Rita (that's a tough one, but there is no soul music on Pepper's, and it's hard to imagine, too; but Lovely Rita could have done with a little more soul)
Tomorrow Never Knows - A Day In The Life (maybe not equal to some; but it's not about the grade of experimentation, I could very well do without the orchestra part, but the song and group arrangement is fantastic; besides it's one of Ringo's absolute top moments)

Well, just a mind game... it doesn't work 100 %, I agree.
Truely speaking: they should have taken more time, write a couple more songs, let Brian Wilson do his thing, whenever he gets it ready. He would have needed a lot more time anyway. And everybody would be happy! (well, except for you garage guys who don't like pop sike anyway, hahaha!)